Reading Reflection Prompt: After reading Chapters 3 and 4, return to the
quote from Harper and Kilarr on p. 41. Respond to this quote on your blog,
saying whether you agree or disagree and explain why or why not using ample
evidence from the text to support your assertions.
I agree with Harper and
Kilarr’s quote about reading instruction and how it isn’t an exact process. I do not believe a reader must read every
word in a passage or story correctly in order to gain meaning from the
text. I found the explanation of cloze test of pages 42 and 43
helpful. Weaver stated that a reader
would only need about four-fifths of the words present in a passage to develop
an understanding of the text. This proves
how a reader uses syntactic and semantic context in passages containing unfamiliar
words to still gain appropriate meaning.
I also found the information Weaver provided in chapter three about how
a reader’s schema contributes to identifying and misidentifying words very
interesting. The example, on page 48,
using the word “encyclopedia” illustrated this well. It was interesting to see how a fourth-grade
student correctly read the word within a sentence with the typical meaning of
encyclopedia, but wasn’t sure how to pronounce the word when it was used as a
name. However, the student was recognizing
the word was used in a different context even though he was unsure of the pronunciation. Therefore, the meaning of the text wasn’t
lost.
I was especially intrigued
when Weaver’s text made me think about the sight word lists I’ve used in the
past. I guess I’ve never thought about
how much beginning readers relied on context, and how reading isolated words
might be somewhat awkward. All the more
experienced teachers I work with use sight word lists to assess the students,
so I do too, but now I’m questioning that method. In the past it made sense to me to learn a
list of words and then you would be able to recognize those words in sentences,
which would lead to reading passages more fluently. However, it actually does make more sense to
use the sight words in phrases or sentences, especially in the primary grades. Before we left for summer break my team did
discuss using Fry Phrases next year, so I am looking forward to implementing those
after reading this chapter.
Through various reading
strategies readers learn new words, their meanings, and begin to understand
challenging texts. It’s not whether they
read with 100% accuracy or a certain number of words per minute that’s most
important, but whether they understand what they are reading and comprehend the
text to the point of being able to discuss it with others. This is something I have brought to my
classroom parents’ attention when they would be upset that their straight “A”
child had a low fluency score. I’ve had
children in my classroom who read at a slower rate than average and/or would
miss a few words, but could accurately answer questions and discuss the text. I believe this goes along with the point
Harper and Kilarr were making in their quote.
Nikole,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your take on the reading! I definitely agree with the quote as well. This upcoming school year (which will actually be my first year of teaching) my principal is wanting to implement running records. I student taught at the same school so we have had a couple of "trainings" on how to properly use running records. As I read through these chapters, I began to really question whether running records would be helpful or not. When using running records, part of the process is to count the number of words that student read incorrectly. The other part of the assessment is comprehension. Then there is a way to kind of put them together and determine if the student is ready to go to the next reading level. I worry that teachers will hold back students by taking the 100% accuracy and fluency too much into account. If a student understands 100% of the reading text, then how are we as teachers suppose to say, "No, sorry. You need to correctly read every single word before moving on?" It is a very sticky situation. Some teachers have been using running records for years. I worry that I will be required to do them and in the way that might hinder a student's progress. Luckily, I'll have Weaver's text available to maybe offer new suggestions from it.
I also never realized how much that beginning readers (and even proficient ones) relied on the context of a word in order to pronounce it correctly. Weaver gave some great examples about how true this was - especially the Encyclopedia example.
Great thoughts!