Module
1: Activity 2
Exercise #5 on p. 39
a. What is a
corandic? Corandic is an emurient grof
with many fribs.
b. What does a
corandic grank from? From corite
c. How do garkers
excarp the tarances from the corite?
Garkers excarp by glarcking the corite and starping it in
tranker-clarped storbs.
d. What does the
slorp finally frast? A pragety, blickant
crankle: coranda
e. What is coranda? A cargurt, grinkling corandic and borigen
f. How is the
corandic nacerated from the borigen? By means
of loracity
g. What do the
garkers finally thrap? A glick, bracht, glupous
grapant, corandic, which granks in many starps.
How
is it that you are able to answer such questions?
I was able to answer these questions because it didn’t require
much thought, and I didn’t have to prove how I knew any of the answers. It was simple because all I had to do was
pick out key words in the questions and then find the same key words in the
passage and copy down the other words that directly followed. Another thing that made answering these questions
easy is the fact that the questions were listed in the same order as the story. Even though I think I answered these
questions correctly, I’ve gathered no true meaning from the passage. I couldn’t tell or teach someone else about
what I just read. I do know that the
main idea is information about corandic, and I believe this would be a
non-fiction passage, but I haven’t learned anything significant from the
passage.
What
does this experience suggest about the kinds of “comprehension” questions found
in workbooks and on standardized tests?
This
activity clearly shows how a struggling reader could perform well on a test,
especially if he/she had been taught test taking skills. The questions didn’t require you to actually
understand what you read. I know I’ve
seen and given reading assignments such as these. However, it’s more obvious to me now, after
completing the assignment myself with non-sense words, that this isn’t a true
or ideal assessment. This is why
performance-based activities and assessments are considered to be a more accurate
view of what children truly know.
No comments:
Post a Comment